Buying a Masticating Juicer vs Centrifugal Juicer

November 14, 2013

More and more people have been particular and/or conscious with their health. Well, consuming healthy foods such as vegetables and fruits is the most effective and practical scheme en route to achieving a healthy body, without a doubt. With this, you would need a juicer to prepare these healthy foods in one way or another. Needless to emphasize, a juicer allows you to extract the essential elements (juice, vitamins and minerals) from the fruits and vegetables efficiently. The question now is, what is the best type of juicer to utilize when preparing your juice?

The good news is that you’ve got only two options to choose from. Actually, a juicer has mainly two types namely, masticating juicer and centrifugal juicer. As the titles suggest, you now probably have an idea about the difference between the two. Nevertheless, it is worth considering the detailed different features of the two to aid you in deciding whether to buy a masticating juicer or a centrifugal juicer.


Masticating Juicer

Centrifugal Juicer

A. Design Generally, a masticating juicer has a horizontal structure. It consists of a tube where vegetables and fruits are placed before they are squeezed. This juicer makes use of an auger. Typically, a centrifugal juicer is characterized as having a vertical and/or upright figure. It contains sharp blades used to shred the fruits and vegetables into pulps. This juicer operates by spinning the blades rapidly, which is why it is called or branded as such (centrifugal). 
B. Cost The cost of a masticating juicer is relatively more expensive as compared with a centrifugal juicer. This juicer has a starting price at around $200.  A centrifugal juicer could be bought at around $100. Nevertheless, there are more expensive ones with prices that range between $200 up to $500.
C. Works best with  A masticating juicer is ideal to use with leafy greens, herbs, spinach, cilantro, parsley and wheatgrass. This juicer operates gentler as compared with centrifugal juicer. It also generates and/or extracts more juice as compared to the other juicer (centrifugal juicer).  A centrifugal juicer works rapidly and forcefully. This is perfect to employ in extracting juices from hard fruits and vegetables. 
D. Shelf life  Generally, the juice extracted with the use of masticating juicer lasts longer in contrast to the centrifugal juicer. It warrants emphasis that, it produces better quality of the juice. This juicer produces heat, in one way or another, considering that it spins the foods speedily. Consequently, the juice hauled out must be consumed right away as it quickly drops of the nutrients and vitamins. 
E. Convenience 


A masticating juicer is easier to use and is more efficient. It is fairly quiet and much easier to clean.  A centrifugal juicer usually generates more noise.
F. Others  A masticating juicer is highly flexible as it can also be used to process other foods, such but are necessarily limited to: pasta, baby food and the like. Moreover, it can be utilized to grind/crush meat and even prepare a peanut butter.  Normally, a centrifugal juicer has limited functions as it can only be used to juice up hard vegetables and fruits.


Clearly, masticating and centrifugal juicers have their own strengths and weaknesses. Nevertheless, the masticating juicer appears to have the upper hand taking into account its attributes, as illustrated above. It is worthy to note as well that masticating juicer was developed later. In fact, it is has been tailored to emulate the centrifugal juicer. Normally, advancements and developments have been incorporated into the masticating juicer. However, this is not to discount the centrifugal juicer as it has certain advantages as well, such as it is relatively cheaper as compared to the masticating. In addition, it is more powerful as compared to the masticating juicer, very useful in crushing hard fruits and vegetables. By the end of the day, it depends upon your decision whether to buy masticating or centrifugal juice, or why not both?


Previous post:

Next post: